It will express your best interest—especially if you had a lot of hard things to say. Be genuine in your motivations, and genuine action will follow.
, meaning, have the best intentions for helping the writer. This section concerns authorial intent and has as its purpose the critic’s growth as an interpreter of that intent.
It does not equate to coddling—being so nice you’ll never say a hard thing—nor does it equate to browbeating—being so hard you’ll never say a nice thing.
Being dishonest or refusing to offer valid criticism where you’re able is a disservice to the writer. Few things are more constructive than hard truths delivered by critics who genuinely want to help and who tailor their criticism with an attitude of genuine interest.
Others decry the very sort of criticism writers’ groups and workshop sites like Scribophile foster, suggesting that the perfunctory nature of such criticism is ultimately more harmful than helpful.
Creative Writing Critique Guidelines Dissertation Table Of Contents Template
Scribophile as a community thrives on the principle of serious commitment to serious writing, and the foundation of that commitment is reading and responding to others’ work.The critic did me doubly wrong not only by being obnoxious, but by retarding my growth as a writer.Unnecessarily harsh criticism is a sign of literary and personal immaturity. Every writer likes to be praised, especially by those not obligated to praise them due to marital status or having given birth to them.“As for literary criticism in general: I have long felt that any reviewer who expresses rage and loathing for a novel or a play or a poem is preposterous.He or she is like a person who has put on full armor and attacked a hot fudge sundae or a banana split.” Few things will more quickly deflate a writer than unnecessarily harsh criticism.This section is not so much about “It is important to appreciate the amount of subjectivity and pre-understanding all readers and listeners bring to the process of interpreting acts of human communication.But unless a speaker or author can retain the right to correct someone’s interpretation by saying ‘but that’s not what I meant’ or ‘that’s not even consistent with what I meant,’ all human communication will quickly break down.”—what the author desired the audience to receive from their work.If you want to explore some elements helpful to improving your critiquing skills, I invite you to get yourself some hot caffeine, strap on your thinking cap, and read on.Listed here are some ideas I’ve found helpful for approaching others’ work; these tips are about your mindset as a critic. The best teacher is experience, and I encourage all writers to reflect on the ways in which they approach others’ work as well as how they can best contribute to the growth of others on and off of Scribophile.Conversely, we might be willing to share our opinions with other writers while struggling with our competence. If we’re critiquing on Scribophile, we may feel that we are wasting one of the author’s coveted “spotlight” critiques.Having used Scribophile on-and-off since 2009, I’ve seen countless readers qualify their commentary on my own work (“I don’t read your genre,” “I haven’t read your previous chapters,” “I’m not good with grammar,” etc.) and I’ve seen even more cry woe on the forums about how they can’t critique because they’re not experienced enough, not educated enough, or not talented enough.