In any case, you must use strong arguments to support your points.
Throughout the reading, maybe you identified some contradictions in the article.
Wiley Online Library requires cookies for authentication and use of other site features; therefore, cookies must be enabled to browse the site.
If the author’s style is incomprehensive, you may use that argument as an element of your critique.
When you’re questioning the main elements and points of the article, remember: you’re not obliged to write a negative critique. If you agree with all points, you’ll write a positive critique. If you’re somewhere in between (that’s the usual approach of article critiques), you’ll emphasize both the positive and negative elements of the article.Although your main purpose is not persuasion, you still have to develop a convincing discussion.To achieve that, you must wonder whether or not the writer’s overall message is logical. You hardly have the entire base of knowledge needed for analyzing a researcher’s work.Yes; it will require more reading, but it will help you identify the weak points in the article, so you’ll be able to critique it. All you need to do is organize them in a clear outline, so you’ll know what logical progression to follow as you discuss the article.If the author cited untrustworthy evidence, you may add that point in your critique. Once you’re ready, you may start with the writing process.It’s not that hard to start writing the introduction.You should provide the title of the article you’re critiquing, its author’s name, the journal where it was published, and the publication date. Most types of academic papers contain a thesis statement in the introduction.So you simply assume that you’ll need to read a research article and then discuss it from a critical point of view. However, the article critique is a much more complex challenge than most students expect.Before we get any further, allow us to explain what a good article critique should deliver: Now that we elaborated on that definition, let’s get to the main point: how to critique an article.Researchers, whether intentionally or unintentionally, can be biased.Thus, they may ignore contrary evidence or even misinterpret it, so they will turn it to their advantage. An architect with traditional education, for example, has prejudices towards feng shui, and they will ignore some evidence that might prove the benefits of that method.