Sadly, this was the case for such servants who devoted themselves to lives of labor ultimately to no avail.
Indentured servitude had an overall negative impact on the world.
In Document1, Herman Merivale makes indentured servitude seem almost ethical as compared to slavery.
However, as British Undersecretary of the Colonies, Merivale is a government official who obviously benefits from the servants’ labor.
An additional diary or journal entry from an indentured servant himself would further support the thesis by providing personal reasons for why someone of a lower status would join the indentured servitude workforce, rather than a statement from an elite official.
Furthermore, in Document 2, an editorial from a South African newspaper explains how the need for labor is increasing exponentially, especially in South Africa, which eventually welcomed a great influx of indentured servants from India.
During the 17th and 18th centuries, these people migrated to the Americas to work on plantations, cultivating cash crops like tobacco and bringing great wealth to plantation owners.
Unlike slaves, indentured servants were only required to work for as long as their contracts stated.
Caused by underprivileged individuals’ desires for better lives and plantations’ need for labor to meet the growing demand for resources, indentured servitude had a negative impact on the world by altering global demographics and forcing servants to face arduous living and working conditions.
Indentured servitude, like slavery, was necessary in order to meet growing demands for labor, although indentured servants were not seized by violence and ultimately aimed to better their lives.