In a scientific article, the discussion section allows the researcher to interpret the findings of the results of a study.The intellectual basis for this can be traced back to the scientific method itself—hypothesis, experimentation and interpretation of results.Unless the author is requested by the journal or advisor to included Results and Discussions together, explanations and interpretations of these results should be omitted from the Results.
The discussion section allows the writer to make their original contribution to the literature.
This is the step beyond the reporting of data, but as to its meaning.
The Results section appears third in the section sequence in most scientific papers.
It follows the presentation of the Methods and Materials and is presented before the Discussion section—although the Results and Discussion are presented together in many journals.
The implications for practitioners or policy-makers reflected in your academic article should show: Limitations and suggestions for future research can either be included in one sub-section, or two, depending on the length of the discussion for each one of them.
The Results section of a scientific research paper represents the core findings of a study derived from the methods applied to gather and analyze information.
Discussion Thread - Research papers on a discussion thread explain the fuction of the online tool used by professors and student to discuss specific topics in class.
Discussion Forum - Research papers on discussion forums examine the platform that conitributes knowledge and communication in a thread on the internet.
This guide is intended to help you organize and write a quality research paper for classes taught in the social sciences.
Note: if you have specific questions about how to write a research paper, you should seek advice from your professor before you begin.