When looking at human dignity the attention is usually on the victims of crimes. Man is thought to have an unbreakable dignity and therefore deserves the highest respect.
Human dignity and respect, in regards for the victims of crimes and their relatives, is something that should be considered more closely, especially in connection with the death penalty.
Suppose there is no death penalty in a state and life imprisonment without parole is the maximum punishment.
What is stopping a prisoner who is facing a life imprisonment without parole to commit another murder in the prison?
But when it is eliminated in the truth, justice can be seen as a basic foundation of the legal system.
When discussing the death penalty the characteristic of justice should be at the center of the argument (Anderson, 2008).Ernest van den Haag, in his article "On Deterrence and the Death Penalty" mentions, "One abstains from dangerous acts because of vague, inchoate, habitual and, above all, preconscious fears" (193). Most criminals would think twice if they knew their own lives were at stake.Although there is no statistical evidence that death penalty deters crime, but we have to agree that most of us fear death. It is better to let court handle it rather than to let the victims carry out the sentence.Death Penalty Support of the Death Penalty Violent crimes like murder are part of the cruelest, most heartless and reproachful crimes that exist.The death penalty is not something that is preferred.But this punishment often called for because nothing else will do.Justice is a highly considered word in both society and in politics.In the justice system though justice has, both as a word and as an idea, ended up existing in the dark.Thirdly, death penalty assures safety of the society by eliminating these criminals.Finally, I believe in "lex tallionis" - a life for a life.