Keep in mind that acknowledgement of a study's limitations is an opportunity to make suggestions for further research.If you do connect your study's limitations to suggestions for further research, be sure to explain the ways in which these unanswered questions may become more focused because of your study.
But, do not use this as an excuse for not developing a thorough research paper!
Review the tab in this guide for developing a research topic.
Claiming limitations is a subjective process because you must evaluate the impact of those limitations.
Don't just list key weaknesses and the magnitude of a study's limitations.
Here, we will dive a bit deeper into the differences between limitations and delimitations and provide some helpful tips for addressing them in your research project—whether you are working on a quantitative or qualitative study. Defining Boundaries These concepts are easy to get confused because both limitations and delimitations restrict (or limit) the questions you’ll be able to answer with your study, most notably in terms of generalizability.
However, the biggest difference between limitations and delimitations is the degree of control you have over them—that is, how much they are based in conscious, intentional choices you made in designing your study.
This is because one occurrence of a piece of data, or a code, is all that is necessary to ensure that it becomes part of the analysis framework.
However, it remains true that sample sizes that are too small cannot adequately support claims of having achieved valid conclusions and sample sizes that are too large do not permit the deep, naturalistic, and inductive analysis that defines qualitative inquiry.
Statements about a study's limitations should not be buried in the body [middle] of the discussion section unless a limitation is specific to something covered in that part of the paper.
If this is the case, though, the limitation should be reiterated at the conclusion of the section.